The Bank of Canada vs COMER case appears to have reached the end of its road. It has once again been tossed out of court and there isn't any more opportunity for them to amend their claim and re-file. As recent as February of this year, the court has ordered that COMER have their amended claim struck entirely, the leave to amend was refused, and that costs should be awarded to the Defendants.
The COMER case has been ongoing for several years and it was one which was looking to return the Bank of Canada to its pre-1974 mandate of offering interest-free loans. In their case, COMER argued that there has been an extensive breach of the Constitution, when it comes to the current monetary system in Canada. Galati, on behalf of COMER, was arguing that there has been an abdication of executive and parliamentary duty when it comes to the Canadian budget, and that the actual revenues are not presented to Parliament.
- See more at: PRESS FOR TRUTH
The COMER case has been ongoing for several years and it was one which was looking to return the Bank of Canada to its pre-1974 mandate of offering interest-free loans. In their case, COMER argued that there has been an extensive breach of the Constitution, when it comes to the current monetary system in Canada. Galati, on behalf of COMER, was arguing that there has been an abdication of executive and parliamentary duty when it comes to the Canadian budget, and that the actual revenues are not presented to Parliament.
- See more at: PRESS FOR TRUTH