Albert & Lesa Lal  ... Transitions Times
December 4, 2014
STATE SANCTIONED KIDNAPPING
 “Secrecy of foster care deaths a sobering story “ Alberta Foster Care Deaths Need Public Inquiry:” November 26, 2013 headlines: A six-month investigation by Edmonton Journal and Calgary Herald reporters, who after a four year legal battle, were finally able to obtain sealed death records, uncovered that there were a startling number of unreported deaths of children in care of the province of Alberta.. Their investigation found 145 foster children had died between 1999 and 2009 while the number of reported deaths were 56. At least 74 of these 145 children who died while in protective care were Aboriginal or Métis.  

Shocking exposes against the state and Infringements on the rights of parents over the lives of their children are appearing with great frequency across the globe. Children snatched from their parental homes, under the guise of “the best interests of the child “ is rampant.  This is the doctrine used by courts to determine a wide range of issues relating to the well-being of children. The late Senator Nancy Schaefer, in her paper “The Corrupt Business Of Child Protective Services” heeded us warning that child protective services are corrupt and the entire system is broken beyond repair.  “The Department of Child Protective Services, known as the Department of Family and Children Service (DFCS) in Georgia, has become a “protected empire” built on taking children and separating families.” (Schaefer)  Senator Schaefer spoke out on numerous occasions regarding the unlimited power of these agencies.  “Children are seized unnecessarily from their families due to federal aid. In order to receive ‘adoption incentives’ or ‘bonuses’, local CPS must have more children. There is a lack of accountability at all levels, and it is a growing criminal / political phenomenon spreading around the globe.” (Schaefer) Under the auspices of keeping children safe and healthy, the state has usurped the role of “parent” away from actual parents. 

After  a 4 year of investigation Nancy Schaefer published a scathing expose on the corruption of child protection agencies. Not long after publishing this report she lost her position as a Georgia State Senator and less then three years later, after growing public awareness of the widespread corruption, from all levels of government and industry, Senator Nancy Schaefer died at her home with her husband of 52 years, Bruce Schaefer in an apparent murder-suicide. 

Thousands upon thousands of families are torn apart each year for seemingly no good reason by our secretive family court systems. Armed officers and child protection personnel can storm into a home and take children away based on as little as one anonymous complaint. The right of officials to seize a child without a warrant is virtually universal. The accused is denied the right of trial by jury and cases are covered in the state sanctioned family courts. A child can be removed by judicial decree regardless of whether sufficient proof exists to convict the parent of any criminal activity. The anonymous complaint can be made by anyone; the neighbor who dislikes you, the ex-wife, ex-husband who wants revenge, a parent who refuses to pay for childcare, a doctor who spots a bruise, a teacher who has concerns. Officials do not have to tell the alleged offender why they were accused, or what acts they were supposed to have committed.  In Canada, if you suspect a child is being abused or neglected, you have the legal duty to report your concern to your local child welfare worker. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, to which Canada is a signatory, according to numerous provincial reports, requires us to do so.

Child “protection” is one of the biggest businesses in the Western world.  The USA alone spends $12 billion a year on it. (Little Hoover Commission) The money goes to tens of thousands of state employees, professionals, such as lawyers, court personnel, court investigators, evaluators and guardians, judges, and CPS contracted vendors such as counselors, therapists, more “evaluators”, psychologists, residential facilities, foster parents, adoptive parents, and the list goes on. 

As for the benefit to the child removed from the home, the statistics speak for themselves. According to The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect (NCCAN), children are abused far more in care than at home. The calculated average is for every 1 abused child removed from an abusive home, there are 17 children removed from loving non-offending homes nationwide. The largest targeted type of families are low income, children with disabilities and minorities.  From the report “Still In Our Hands: A Review of Efforts to Reform Foster Care,” it was found  find that an estimated 25% of children taken away have not received timely medical care and that 50% lack needed mental health services. Since 1999, an estimated 2,800 children have left the system at age 18 only to become homeless. According to a number of foster care experts, children in foster care  are three or four more times as likely to be on psychotropic medications than other children on Medicaid. 

The research contained in Senator Schaefer report is the tip of the iceberg of the volumes of information that can be found from a multitude of sources. Much of the information comes from parents and family members desperately trying to fight for the best interest of their children. The statistics and sheer multitude of individuals involved in these tragedies, caused by state run child protection services, reveals more and more of what is obvious; the system is totally broken and we must stop allowing the state to tell individuals what is in our best interest. Parents, direct family members, friends and communities, who do not profit monetarily, need to take the power away from these bureaucracies. More government oversight or inquiries are not the answer to this tragedy. It is sheer lunacy to think so.  Despite some perhaps good intentioned social workers, agencies, and U.N. committees, when money and power are incentives, the “best interests of the child” and the public at large, are left to the wayside.  History has proven on numerous occasions that when we allow the state to take over we are left with atrocities. We, are seeing this now on a global level. 

We invite you to listen to the following pod-casts; two are from grandmothers who have been witnessed the horrific system and are crying out for help and whistle blower, Carlos Morales, a former CPS Investigator, who exposes the seedy underworld of foster homes in the U.S. and offers us his insight and solutions, in order to tackle the monstrous program perpetrated by the State.

References:
The Corrupt Business of Child Protective Services, Nancy Schaefer, November 2007
Still In Our Hands: A Review of Efforts to Reform, Foster Care in California February 2003
Little Hoover Commission, To Protect & Prevent: Rebuilding California’s Public Health System, 2003
“Secrecy of foster care deaths a sobering story “ Alberta Foster Care Deaths Need Public Inquiry:” November 26, 2013 Edmonton Journal and Calgary Herald

https://www.facebook.com/WaStateGov/posts/435661709914282?fref=nf
http://medicalkidnap.com/2014/10/27/medical-kidnap-business-judges-skirting-the-law-for-federal-funds/
http://www.smh.com.au/national/jail-for-parents-who-allowed-daughter-to-die-20090928-g8x2.html
We will continue to update this blog in an attempt to provide as much information as possible to this ongoing travesty.  Please bookmark and share.  It is time to rise up and ban together agaisnt our corrupt states.

Article posted on CBC News
Eagle wing trafficking case to be heard in Lethbridge court
Powwow dancer Rachel CrowSpreadingWings argues she has constitutional right to possess eagle parts CBC News 
Posted: Nov 12, 2014 8:29 AM MT Last Updated: Nov 12, 2014 7:52 PM MT
An aboriginal spiritual leader on trial in southern Alberta says she has a constitutional right to buy and possess eagle parts.

• Rachel CrowSpreadingWings fights charges of trafficking eagle feathers

Rachel CrowSpreadingWings is fighting charges of trafficking and possession of eagle parts after she acquired an eagle wing she says was intended for traditional ceremonial use. (Rachel CrowSpreadingWings)
Rachel CrowSpreadingWings, a member of the Kainai Nation or Blood Tribe, was charged last year with trafficking and possession of wildlife parts after buying an eagle wing.

She appeared in a Lethbridge courtroom Wednesday on the charges.
CrowSpreadingWings admits she paid $250 for an eagle wing in January 2013, but said she intended to use it to make powwow regalia for her family

Selling or possessing eagle parts is illegal under the Alberta Wildlife Act. The maximum penalty for both charges is $100,000 in fines and two years in jail.

But CrowSpreadingWings, a traditional powwow dancer, says the province did not have the right to lay charges.
“Most of my argument is based on the constitution and your guarantee as a Canadian citizen to be free to be who you are, and to practice your religion and live your culture freely.”

Eagle feathers are considered sacred by many First Nations in North America. Feathers, wings and sometimes whole eagles are used in spiritual ceremonies and to adorn traditional regalia.
CrowSpreadingWings is representing herself in court, but said she had no choice.

She says she can't afford a lawyer and she is not eligible for legal aid because the charges are not under the Criminal Code.

Crowspreadingwings said she is also not finding it easy to navigate the court system on her own.

The trial is expected to take three days.

When I first met Deepan Budlakoti in October 2013 he was clearly exhausted. He had just come off an 18-hour shift as a tow-truck driver. He had been working 90 to 100 hours a week, in part to help pay the legal expenses for his court challenge against the Canadian government, now totalling $50,000.

While Deepan was serving three years in prison for drug and firearms charges, a racial-profiling prison guard brought him to the attention of the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA). The CBSA then determined he should be deported to India, a country he has never been to. The Harper government is hoping to make banishment a more regular activity now that their Bill C-24 "Strengthening Canadian Citizenship Act" has become law. The bill raises the bar for acquiring citizenship and allows it to be revoked by a parliamentary minister, with no possible appeal in court.

A survivor
Deepan currently lives under house arrest while the government plan his deportation to a country that understandably refuses to accept him because he has never lived there. Since we met in October, he also lost his job and today lives solely from the support of others.

The injustice here is that Deepan has served the time for the crimes he committed so is being subjected to double-punishment. In fact, he came out of prison with university courses under his belt and a college diploma. This is especially impressive given the facilities he resided in are, by many accounts, in a state of "crisis" from over-crowding due to new mandatory sentencing laws.

People & Power - The people smugglers
To manage over-crowding, administrators keep prisoners on lock-down for weeks at a time and have increased the use of segregation (solitary confinement). This year the federal prison guard union even came out in protestagainst these conditions, which they say makes their job more dangerous because tensions are higher among inmates.

In spite of his time-served, the Canadian media continue to portray Deepan as a "criminal". More accurate language given the theoretical underpinnings of our legal system is that he is an "ex-offender", "former-prisoner" or at least the colloquial "ex-con". More accurate language given the reality of the prison system is that he is a survivor.

Government spokesperson, Alexis Pavlich, Press Secretary for Citizenship and Immigration Minister Chris Alexander, argues that Deepan "should not have chosen a life of crime if he did not want to be deported from Canada". There are two problems with this. The first is that he has served the punishment for the crime as determined in a court of law. Secondly, it avoids the issue of how Deepan arrived at this "life of crime".

The facts of Deepan's life make it impossible to ignore the complicity of the Canadian state and society in forming his path. That is because he was, technically, their child. Deepan was born in Ottawa to new immigrants who had arrived as domestic staff for the Indian ambassador before taking work for a Canadian physician. The government claims he cannot be Canadian because his parents were not technically employed in Canada - something Deepan denies (He was issued a provincial birth certificate and later a Canadian passport).

Having run away from home at the age of 12, Deepan got into trouble with the law and was taken in as a ward of the state by 13. The state therefore became his formal guardian. From there he moved through juvenile detention centres, foster care and the public school system. In this process, he experienced various forms of racism and believes he was streamed into the worst schools for forsaken students.

Deepan does not offer many details of the challenges he faced at home as a child. However, the reality for new immigrants then and now is that they face racism, poverty and insufficient social support systems. In these circumstances, people commonly feel isolated, which increases stresses within the home. Nostalgia and fear of losing connection with one's past can sometimes lead immigrant parents to be stern, perhaps as they hope to protect their children from a rapidly changing world. Children also often feel stronger pressures to excel in school.

These are some of the factors that led Deepan to flee home at a young age. He soon found himself in group-homes with 7-10 other children who had few prospects in life. Crime was all around him and he eventually got pulled in. In hindsight, he says he was not thinking of the broader picture, but was simply trying to survive on a daily basis. Unfortunately he was also growing up at a time when tough-on-crime politics were on the rise with conservative provincial and federal governments pushing a prison privatisation agenda.

Strengthening Canadian citizenship? 
Deepan believes the Canadian government is abdicating its responsibility by trying to push him off to India. As he says, "they made me who I am." It is the Canadian state that turned him into a criminal - or at least created the conditions for it to happen.

Witness - To the Last Drop - Part 1
Some suggest this case, along with Bill C-24, actually weakens Canadian citizenship. Josh Paterson, Executive Director of the BC Civil Liberties Association suggests, "This bill turns the whole idea of being Canadian upside-down, so that the Canadian citizenship of some people will be worth less than the Canadian citizenship of others".

While these are important points of critique, they appeal to a nationalist sentiment that sees Canada as a kinder and gentler capitalist nation - one that has embraced diversity and multi-culturalism. Yet this narrative fails to account for the fact that the creation of Canada is entwined with processes of exclusion.

In the words of eminent historical geographer, Cole Harris, conquest involved the "making of native space"  (i.e. reserves). Lynn Gehl has provided a concise list and comment on key aspects of this history of exclusion here. 

Citizenship in Canada has always relied on the state powers of exclusion while naturalising European settlement (itself stratified, with an Anglo-Scottish elite on top).

Thus today when the Harper government claims it is "strengthening Canadian citizenship" they are actually reasserting an image of Canada that is white, just as they are continually reasserting the country's relationship with the British Mkonarchy. It is a discourse that also justifies what a Federal Court Judge Anne Mactavish has called "cruel and unusual treatment" against refugees by denying them healthcare.

However the Harperites argue a little cruelty is necessary to "vigorously defend (s) the interests of Canadian taxpayers" against supposedly "fraudulent refugees". They would be more honest if they replaced the term "tax payers" with "white power".

The tragedy of this cruelty is that it comes as greater numbers of people than ever before are having their livelihoods destroyed amid war and economic deprivation - much of it serving Canadian business interests, whether it be in Gaza, Latin America, or acting as the Empire's Ally in the war on terror. Today there are about 231.5 million international migrants in the world - three percent of the global population. Bill C-24 sends the message they should go somewhere else.

Deepan's case, however, provides the first opportunity for decent Canadians to challenge the cruel logic behind bill C-24 and in turn push back against the hardening of state walls and the far-right agenda that prevails in Canada.

Toby Moorsom teaches at Queen's University in Canada and is an editor of Nokoko Journal of African Studies.

Follow him on Twitter: @tobymoorsom

The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial policy.

The people of Canada suffer in silence as they are selected, one by one, and are persecuted by an out of control, unlawful, unconstitutional, violating Government.

How does it work? 

The government constantly creates new laws and has thousands of laws sitting in dirty books of tricks that every elected and unelected government official have by their side at all times. There are too many of these tricks and laws and regulations for any one person to understand and remember, so they have armies of lawyers, all paid for with your tax money, to keep these things straight for them.... but not for you. 

A lot of the laws are unConstitutional, but that doesn't matter because government is above the law or so they think. An example here might be a Corporation owned in whole or in part by the Government, operating in the private marketplace in competition with other, generally smaller, privately-owned companies. Certainly, the Federal Government has the power of "Regulation of trade and commerce" (BNA Act 1867, 91.2) but it was not given the power to ENGAGE IN trade and commerce, the very idea of a Government company appealing a Government decision in a Government courtroom being simply too absurd to consider. As to the provinces, their powers are regulatory only. The Federal Government has NO power to engage in the public marketplace.... and the Provinces have even less.

But that's not how it works in The Real World. For the private citizen or the small company, it is like playing cards against the Government, in a casino which they own, playing against a stacked deck in a game in which the Government can invent whatever card they want, the whole game overseen by a croupier whose decisions are bought in advance and paid for.... with your money. 

Eventually the government will find you in violation of one of their statute laws or some regulation made under one. If they want to punish you, break you or simply take your property, you are now in serious trouble. You are now Public Enemy Number One, and all the weight of Government is dropped on you because the Crown and the Public Well Being are at risk.

Government sees its task as GOVERNING, which means CONTROLLING, which in itself implies FORCING. It is naked force arrayed against YOU and it is always You versus the Crown. Every Canadian has the right to face their accuser in an open court.... but the Crown, the cowardly Government always hides behind the Crown.

The government not by law but by tradition always picks lawyers to be appointed judges arbitrarily by the premier, or prime minister. Every starting-out young lawyer has his eye on the prize: the best defence attorneys quickly are offered jobs as Crown Prosecutors, which they all know is the stepping-stone to a Magistracy, a Judgeship, a seat on the Appellate Court and finally the Supreme Court. It is a stairway paved with gold if you are smart enough and serve your paymaster: the Government. This results in self serving, government serving, courts which have no interest in common sense, Common Law, the Magna Carta, the Constitution of Canada, the 1960 Bill of Rights.... or in Justice. Their only interest is to serve their masters, the Government which appointed them, the foreign interests which influence them and (never forget!) their lawyer buddies licking their chops and waiting to become judges themselves, and their own personal ambition.

Go to your local court house and witness the Government persecution of your fellow Canadians, most of them suffering in silence. Always there is a slick, sleek, well-fed, overpaid lawyer representing the Crown. Often there is a fellow Canadian trying to represent him or herself, always the Judge always suggesting that he get a lawyer (Yeah, right, at $400 per hour, and remember that you only get into their court after they have bled you white with regulations and fees: ask anyone who has been there!). If you still can afford a lawyer, or mortgage your home to hire one, there is the problem that your hot-dog Lawyer never represents the best interests of the person paying them: they are far too busy licking their chops, never rocking the boat, dreaming about being appointed a Judge by the Government.

This is how it is for far too many people, in far too many courthouses, on far too many days. It is a national and international disgrace as well as an insult to the very Crown it claims to represent.

The Canadian Action Party and the people of Canada know this is wrong. One day in the near future, when the people of Canada become the legal government of Canada, this corrupt system around each of us, constantly threatening us, this out of control Government, will be ended. Canada and its people finally will have what they were promised in 1867: "Peace, Order and Good Government" under our lawful Constitution.

More information on the Registered Canadian Action Party here:
www.canadianactionparty.org
Twitter:@actionparty
Youtube: 
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCII1zHL9e4oqOosv_V0CM3A
CAP Discussion Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/588565277882894/
Become a member of the Canadian Action Party or make a TAX REFUNDABLE donation: http://www.canadianactionparty.org/#!join-now/c22ri

(Sigue en español)
The Federal Court hearing has been rescheduled. Come gather outside the court house again, and show your support for Jose Figueroa, who remains in sanctuary due to an unjust deportation order.

Steven Blaney, the Minister of Public Safety, refused to issue a certificate to Jose, even though he was legally obliged to issue it within 15 days of receiving the application! When the hearing takes place, it will have been over a year since the minister failed to comply with the law...

#WeAreJose

La audiencia ante la Corte Federal ha sido re-programada. Ven nuevamente a las afueras de la Corte Federal y muestra tu apoyo por Jose Figueroa, quien aun permanece en santuario debedio a una orden de deportación injusta.

Steven Blaney, el Ministro de Seguridad Publica, reusó emitir un certificado a Jose, aun y cuando estaba obligado legalmente a emitirlo en un plazo de 15 dias despues de recibir la aplicacion. El dia de la audiencia habran pasado mas de un año desde que el ministro falló en cumplir con la ley...

PLEASE SHOW SUPPORT BY SIGNING THIS PETITION.

http://www.change.org/en-CA/petitions/canada-s-minister-for-immigration-chris-alexander-and-minister-for-public-safety-steven-blaney-take-note-of-canada-s-recent-federal-court-decision-in-the-case-of-jose-figueroa-and-allow-him-to-stay-in-canada-with-his-family?share_id=cHDsrdkNZP&utm_campaign=autopublish&utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=share_petition

"This is a disgrace. We need more public awareness of these cases in the news. Canadian citizens would be surprised at how much of our freedoms and rights are in the hand of just a few and if those few with some power decide to misuse what authority they have been given, as they seem to sometimes do, the Canadian people would be outraged. (Especially when it happens to them)"  Anonymous

Article found on http://thejennwamboltrant.blogspot.ca/

Crown Prosecutor Claude Hache, in City of Fredericton, New Brunswick, Provincial Court tried to send Jenn Wambolt to Psychiatric facility in Campbellton, New Brunswick.

January, 24, 2013, the Crown Prosecutor Crown Attorney, Claude Hache tried to send Jenn for thirty days involuntary detention at a psychiatric facility in Campbellton, New Brunswick, however, Crown Attorney Claude Hache carelessly presented no motion or evidence to support his request. What is further shocking is Attorney Claude Hache seemed to fully expect the judge to agree without any law or grounds being argued or presented. Such a detention would have violated Jenn's Charter Rights and Freedoms to have an opportunity to prove there was no need for this - thank goodness there was an appropriate response from judge Pierre Dube.

These stories, such as Jenn's, are sickening. Too many Information's being laid before a Justice by Crown Prosecutor without Crown Council having done a proper CHARGE ASSESSMENT.

Notice to readers the Crown Council has a CHARGE ASSESSMENT GUIDEBOOK which evidentially needs to be referenced as the negligence which is rampant in New Brunswick Crown Prosecutor Office is Criminal in itself.   

If the Crown prosecutor thought Ms Wambolt sufficiently ill to ask she be sent to a psychiatric facility for thirty days, I presume Crown Council did not diligently do the pre-CHARGE ASSESSMENT review - which has amongst all other pertinent matters a requirement to evaluate mental health issues prior to approaching a Justice to lay information for a Trial, which obviously wasn't done...  

However, in Kitchener Dudley George's brother gave a talk many years ago and was stopped by police 25 times on his way out of town. And during the heyday of protests under Mike Harris, people were routinely robbed of their constitutional rights of association, in fact several people were actually 'banned' from entering regional boundaries.

So this stuff is not new, and it is not exclusive to Fredericton, and it also should not be tolerated. However, in order for the public to believe claims online then a lot of evidence has to be available. There should be no doubt in anyone's mind that courts and police can act without integrity, but there are also mentally ill people out there, so the rule in common Law must be evidence, evidence, evidence.  

Plead Guilty or go to Campbellton Psychiatric for a Psychiatric Evaluation ! ?
 
"If you have ever needed psychiatric care, especially psychiatric care that is caused by the typically intrusive and or generally criminal treatment by Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE, you may not be handled judicially. Mind the readers Jenn Wambolt is only charged with a breach of probation.  
 
Nevertheless, in court, the Crown Attorney, Claude Hache, said there was reasonable grounds to send her to Campbellton for Psychiatric evaluation but presented no evident to support that claim.   Crown Attorney, Claude Hache, may have a degree in Psychiatry, but this evidence was not submitted to the court.  Claude Hache further objected to a further adjournment of the case.
 
Judge, Pierre Dube, however, agreed with Defendant’s lawyer, L.A. Henry, and said the defendant has a legitimate defence, as she presently is under the treatment of a psychiatrist. 

The Crown, nevertheless, continued to make his objections, and finally Judge, Pierre Dube cut Crown Attorney, Claude Hache, off.
 
Judge, Pierre Dube  ordered a new date be found for the continuation of the hearing of this matter and after some unacceptable delay the date of May 30, 2013 was finally offered by attending Court Liaison Police Officer Constable Paul Estey.
 
Really would like to report to the readers that this was all there was to say, unfortunately members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE are not about to give up their vendetta, for this reason, as Jenn Wambolt was leaving the courtroom (where Sheriff’s and Police officers had been positioned on either side of the doors, in anticipation of an order to take the accused to Campbellton), Jenn’s husband was confronted by Court Liaison Police Officer Constable Paul Estey and demanded that he had to pay a $25.00 parking fine or be taken to jail forthwith.
 
When did parking fines merit a jail term?  Isn’t Legal Aid provided if there is a possibility of jail for a crime? When did a parking ticket become a criminal offence? This sounds like blackmail and/or revenge. 

Imagine the Canadian government making it illegal to go against genocide .. and this is what they have done .. speaks volumes about our government!
Here is a story that needs to be shared from my activist friend Christine Massey. 

"WOW. Just (20 minutes ago, at 9:50pm) had 2 Peel PIGS pounding on my apartment door, wanting to talk to me about Saturday's rally for Palestine that is supposed to be happening at Brampton City Hall. Uninvited, unexpected, unwanted plain clothes PIGS without a warrant, pounding away and not leaving even after I have told them that I have NOTHING to say to them and that they are not welcome and that I want them to leave. 

Was going to ignore the knocking but they kept POUNDING and so finally I looked through the peephole and saw 2 guys in regular dress shirts and pants. Watched them for a bit, they kept POUNDING so I finally asked who was there, if they had a warrant and when they said no I told them to leave. They said the 'just' wanted to talk to me about Saturday's rally. I said that I am not an organizer for that rally and have nothing to say to them. They kept asking if I would just come out and talk to them. I started shouting so that my neighbours would know that they were there and not wanted and were harassing me. 

One of these PIGS actually sarcastically said (after being told loudly and repeatedly that I didn't want to talk to them) that they couldn't hear me. I just kept repeating that I had nothing to say and for them to get out of the building.

All I have done is tweet and share on FB info about this rally that I learned of from someone who shared the info in a FB group. Does this mean that these PIGS are visiting the homes of everyone who shares this info? Or did they come here because of the emails I sent earlier in the week asking if any Peel PIGS have been trained by the Israeli army or any other army or any private 'security' forces? Or because I have organized other rallies in the past? No idea, but these PIGS acted like assholes and tomorrow I will be sending an email about this not only to the Peel PIGS but to all Peel politicians and to media, plus reminding them that I STILL have not received an answer to my question about their training."